Microsoft over the past week has extended their “Smoked by Windows Phone” web campaign into an in-store contest. Offering a series of challenges, the store pits customer’s own devices against a Windows Phone. If someone wins, they are entitled to a fully-featured HP laptop valued at over a thousand dollars. Losers get a chance to swap their phone out for a free Windows Phone, in a second-place giveaway.
Ice Cream(ed) Sandwich
Sahas Katta, armed his Galaxy Nexus with a few Android 4.0 settings he knew of, and went into the store. Knowing Windows Phone’s infamous Live Tiles feature would be in play, he disabled the lock screen of his device. This is a new feature in Android 4.0, and one that Microsoft planners seem to have forgotten about (or simply weren’t aware of) when planning this contest.
That feature gave just about any Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich owner, an actual clear edge in most of the contests. Since, most of the contests revolved around calling up Live Tiles on the Windows Phone side, one simply needed to place several widgets on the home screen to have information like weather, news, and sports appear instantly.
Mr. Katta was asked to load up weather in two different cities on his phone, as quickly as possible. And, the competition, he claims, began. While the Windows Phone was still being unlocked, Mr. Katta claims he declared himself the winner, since his home screen was instantly unlocked, and he had swiped to two Weather widgets, displaying weather in two cities.
The store abruptly claimed he immediately had lost however, insisting that the Galaxy Nexus could not display weather in multiple states. Mr. Katta had loaded widgets with two California cities, and was initially not told to load weather for multiple states. The store apparently played the Iraqi Information Minister tactic, and chose to argue with the reality right in front of their eyes. The phone could easily load weather for Redmond, WA as fast as it could for San Jose, CA.
Adding insult to injury, after the manager refused to reconsider the situation in Mr. Katta’s favor, the store asked him to take a photo consenting that he had, in fact, lost the challenge, by claiming he was “smoked by Windows Phone”. Mr. Katta says he declined, and left the story in frustration.
While the terms do state that “… (t)hat Microsoft’s decisions will be final and binding on all matters related to this Contest;” we cannot see any way Microsoft could fairly declare any other device a winner, should Mr. Katta be denied here. As such, the term was used in bad faith in our opinion.
We will give the Microsoft Store the benefit of the doubt, the full terms of the contest do appear to point in the direction of allowing a store to reject phones with modified firmware. It is possible, we contend, that the store simply did not want to tell Mr. Katta that they believed he was using a custom firmware on his phone, and chose to tell him some other grounds for disqualification. However, Android 4.0 does ship with the ability to disable a lock screen, straight out of the box.
Mr. Katta may have the last laugh though, this morning his musings on the debacle have spawned an Internet-wide firestorm. Clearly Microsoft should have known that Android 4 came with a new feature that other modern smartphones lacked, the ability to disable the lock screen.
The court of public opinion also appears to be going against Microsoft, adding stinging rebuke to the platform, in fact, by the end of today there may be more anti-Smoked-by-Windows-Phone articles out on the web than positive articles for the campaign.
Windows Phone Continues to Struggle
This comes as Microsoft struggles to sell Windows Phones. Microsoft has run several previous gimmicks to push Windows Phones, even going as far as to give them away for free with the purchase of $599 or more from Microsoft Retail Stores. At the time, the phone would have effectively been free considering the no-contract price tag.
Since then, Windows Phones have plummeted in value. Windows Phone 7.5-ready devices, running the latest Windows Phone OS release, have been seen on retailers such as Newegg.com selling for as low as $179.99 with coupon. That’s less than the cost of a Zune HD before it was pulled from market. Oh, and that $179 Windows Phone 7.5 unit we just used as an example was SIM unlocked.
Windows Phone 7’s success, or lack thereof, really doesn’t matter here other than for context purposes. As such, we are joining many other members of the mobile media this morning, and getting opinionated. Microsoft, it’s time to pay up, you owe Mr. Katta a laptop.
Microsoft could owe millions, literally.
The bad news for Microsoft is, anyone with a Galaxy Nexus, and took the challenge, could argue their way into small claims court and say they were at the store and won the challenge. If four thousand people do that in small claims court, that could wind up to be a $4,000,000 legal bill for the company, before legal fees get tacked on.
What really concerns us about the future of Microsoft, is that no engineer, even after this contest was announced, was willing to stand up and warn the company about this being a real and valid concern. Either they didn’t know, or were afraid to speak up.
Full disclosure: As the author of this article, I did meet Sahas Katta a few years back, but have no relationship otherwise, and did not contact him for comment. He has, however, several times backed up his statements on his blog. And, we can confirm from our own testing that his claims are in fact, correct. Android 4 can beat Windows Phone 7 in this regard. Hence, Microsoft probably owes more people that Mr. Katta, a shiny new HP laptop.
Microsoft was contacted at the time of the report, and we will follow-up with any statement they wish to provide.
The Galaxy Nexus ships with Android 4.0 stock so he may not have even had a custom ROM. It sounds like he won fair and square. The people at the store who said he lost were just making up crap.
There will probably be lines of Galaxy Nexus owners taking that challenge now, armed with video cameras. And as other devices get updated, they’ll be doing the same.
This contrast probably won’t be around too much longer. I wish they were holding it around here, I’d go win myself a new laptop before it ends.
14 Microsoft stores, at least 10 computers per store (probably no more), times $1000 per computer is only $140,000. Your sensational $4 billion figure shows a lack of basic research.
I’m curious if you’ve even used a Windows Phone for a week or more…I’ve been rocking an HTC Arrive since the month after its release a year ago (fan boy disclaimer stated upfront).
It’s total consumer fraud. I would sue the living hell out of the store and MS for this. The guy won and then the shopkeeper transparently attempts to change the rules after the fact. Well that’s what consumer fraud is all about. Sheesh. They owe that man a laptop computer.
Tim, the issues is each individual has a valid claim to those 10 laptops per store. Hence, the article’s “sensational” numbers are valid arguments.
We correctly reported that Galaxy Nexus shipped with Android 4. Custom ROMs only were mentioned in the article in reference to what Microsoft may have mistaken Mr. Katta’s phone to have had.
And, to be clear, Samsung provided us with a Focus that we used to confirm our reporting above… I have used Windows Phone 7 as my primary device for well over week-long cycles. My opinion of Windows Phone has no relevance to this report, however.
“Tim, the issues is each individual has a valid claim to those 10 laptops per store. Hence, the article’s “sensational” numbers are valid arguments.”
Each winner gets 10 laptops? Uh, no. From the rules:
“First Prize: One (1) Hunger Games PC (CWF-00587 HP Folio 13 Special Edition). Approximate Retail Value (ARV) $1,049.00.
The total Approximate Retail Value (ARV) of all prizes depends upon the number of winners but will be at least ten (10) per store.”
And I’m glad you’ve tried a WP7 device…figured you would have experienced it in your line of work. However, how has it helped to “confirm our reporting above”?
And Microsoft has awarded him a laptop, so the issue of his award should be resolved. The publicity around the competition surely isn’t over, but you know what they say about publicity…better to be talked about badly than not talked about at all.
[…] look worse as a platform while it continues to struggle for relevance and Microsoft continually stumbles over itself in order to promote its advantages over iPhone and Android. In short, both Microsoft and AT&T […]
Tim, you’re not making a whole lot of sense. Chris clearly commented about his WP7 usage at -your- request. What his take on WP is doesn’t seem to matter here. He seems to have said so quite clearly, too.
Also, his point on the giveaway liability is fair too. MS may have had only one laptop per store… But each cheated contender has equal rights to claim that laptop as their defrauded loss. MS would have a tough time showing a case against each Galaxy Nexus owner that claimed to have lost, especially if they went to the store that day.
Tim, it sounds like your bias is stepping in here not Chris’s.
This blog has always been the epitome of bad grammar and slow reporting.
What happens when you don’t send unknown media publications the newest devices is that they’ll end up misjudging your devices.
Addendum: What I love about SkatterTech is that the guy actually uses the word “I.” It’s clear that he’s basically the only one running the blog. Companies grok that, and they understand why there isn’t some dedicated outreach department pounding them for review phones. Stop using the word “we” and acting like you have an army when you don’t.
What you talkin’ about Yosun? Sorry, couldn’t resist.
Anyways, Christopher and Humberto sure keep taking the heat from the haters. I see lots of sites that deserve the trolling they get, but these guys? Crazy/sad.
Oh and it doesn’t matter what Windozzzze phone you use… Galaxy Nexus still can beat them in the challenges.
[…] see which is faster. If your phone wins, you could get a shot at a $1,000 HP laptop, but that has had mixed results.Basically, you can go to any Microsoft Retail Store, lose the Smoked by Windows Phone challenge, […]
The potential money lost is chump change to a corporation like Microsoft. $4million? That’s like you losing a quarter. The investment is well worth it IF people start transitioning over to windows mobile phones. I like them, but open source is my kicker.